External validity of clinical trials with diverse trastuzumab-based chemotherapy regimens in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab combined with cisplatin and fluoropyrimidines, either capecitabine or 5-fluorouracile (XP/FP), is the standard first-line treatment for advanced, HER2-positive, gastric cancer patients based on the ToGA trial. Despite the lack of phase III trials, many clinicians administer trastuzumab with alternative regimens. One meta-analysis suggests that substituting cisplatin for oxaliplatin might lead to greater efficacy and less toxicity. METHODS: 594 patients with HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma were recruited from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry. The objective was to evaluate the external validity of clinical trials with chemotherapy and trastuzumab. RESULTS: The regimens used in at least 5% of the patients were XP (27%), oxaliplatin and capecitabine (CAPOX) (26%), oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) (14%), FP (14%), triplet with anthracycline/docetaxel (7%), and carboplatin-FU (5%). Median exposure to trastuzumab was longer with FOLFOX (11.4 months, 95% CI, 9.1-21.0) versus ToGA regimens (7.5, 6.4-8.5), p < 0.001. Patients with HER2-IHC 3+ cancers had higher response rates than those with IHC 2+/FISH+, odds-ratio 1.97 (95% CI, 1.25-3.09). The results achieved with CAPOX-trastuzumab were comparable to those attained with ToGA regimens. FOLFOX-trastuzumab was superior to ToGA schemes in terms of overall survival (OS), with a greater magnitude of effect in IHC 2+/FISH+ tumors (HR 0.47, 0.24-0.92) compared with IHC 3+ (HR 0.69, 0.49-0.96), and in diffuse (HR 0.37, 0.20-0.69) versus intestinal-type tumors (HR 0.76, 0.54-1.06). CONCLUSION: We have updated the external validity of clinical trials with trastuzumab in first-line treatment of gastric cancer. Our data confirm the comparable outcomes of ToGA regimens and CAPOX-trastuzumab in clinical practice and point toward a possible benefit of FOLFOX-trastuzumab, contingent on the subtypes typically less sensitive to trastuzumab, to be confirmed in clinical trials.

Is advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma a distinct entity from intestinal subtype gastric cancer? Data from the AGAMENON-SEOM Registry.

BACKGROUND: Advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is generally treated similarly to advanced gastroesophageal junction (GEJ-AC) and gastric (GAC) adenocarcinomas, although GAC clinical trials rarely include EAC. This work sought to compare clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of advanced EAC with those of GEJ-AC and GAC and examine prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants comprised patients with advanced EAC, intestinal GEJ-AC, and GAC treated with platin and fluoropyrimidine (plus trastuzumab when HER2 status was positive). Overall and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression gauged the prognostic value of the AGAMENON model. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2019, 971 participants from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry were recruited at 35 centers. The sample included 67.3% GAC, 13.3% GEJ-AC, and 19.4% EAC. Pulmonary metastases were most common in EAC and peritoneal metastases in GAC. Median PFS and OS were 7.7 (95% CI 7.3-8.0) and 13.9 months (12.9-14.7). There was no difference in PFS or OS between HER2- and HER2+ tumors from the three locations (p > 0.05). Five covariates were found to be prognostic for the entire sample: ECOG-PS, histological grade, number of metastatic sites, NLR, and HER2+ tumors treated with trastuzumab. In EAC, the same variables were prognostic except for grade. The favorable prognosis for HER2+ cancers treated with trastuzumab was homogenous for all three subgroups (p = 0.351) and, after adjusting for the remaining covariates, no evidence supported primary tumor localization as a prognostic factor (p = 0.331). CONCLUSION: Our study supports the hypothesis that EAC exhibits clinicopathological characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment outcomes comparable to intestinal GEJ-AC and GAC.

Reacciones adversas asociadas a la vacunación en pacientes inmunodeprimidos y en situaciones especiales de una Unidad de Vacunas hospitalaria / Vaccine-related adverse reactions in immunocompromised patients and in special situations of a hospital Vaccine Unit

OBJETIVOS: Describir el tipo de vacunas administradas en la Unidad de Vacunas de un hospital de referencia y calcular la tasa de notificación global y específica de las reacciones adversas asociadas. MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional retrospectivo, realizado en el periodo entre noviembre de 2014 y noviembre de 2017, de los pacientes que desarrollaron una reacción adversa a medicamento (RAM) tras la administración de una vacuna y que fue notificada al Sistema Español de Farmacovigilancia. Las variables analizadas fueron edad, sexo, grupo de riesgo, tipo de vacuna, coadministración y tipo de RAM. Se llevó a cabo un análisis univariante y bivariante. Se calculó la tasa de notificación de RAM global y específica para cada vacuna. RESULTADOS: Se administraron un total de 18.123 vacunas de las que el 20,7% correspondían a la vacuna frente al virus de la hepatitis B. Se notificaron 53 sospechas de RAM. En el 64,2% de las ocasiones se había administrado solamente una vacuna. El 88,7% de las notificaciones correspondieron a vacunas inactivadas. La vacuna frente neumococo polisacárida de 23 serotipos fue la que generó el mayor número de notificaciones. La tasa de notificación global de RAM fue de 0,42%. La vacuna hexavalente fue la que registró la tasa de notificación más elevada (2,81%). El 49,1% de las RAM fueron de tipo sistémico. CONCLUSIONES: La tasa de notificación global fue baja aunque superior a la registrada por otros autores. La correcta notificación de posibles reacciones adversas postvacunales es imprescindible para contribuir a la seguridad vacunal y para aumentar la confianza de la población en las vacunas

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to describe the type of vaccines administered in the Vaccine Unit at a reference hospital. Calculate the overall and specific reporting rate of adverse reactions. METHODS: Retrospective observational study for the period between November 2014 and November 2017, on patients who developed an adverse drug reaction (ADR) after the administration of a vaccine and who were notified to the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System. The variables analyzed were age, sex, risk group, vaccine class, co-administration and type of ADR. A univariate and bivariate analysis was performed. The global and vaccine specific rate of ADR notification was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 18,123 vaccines were administered, of which 20.7% corresponded to hepatitis B virus vaccine. Fifty-three RAM suspects were reported. In 64.2% of cases only one vaccine was administered. Inactivated vaccines accounted for 88.7% of notifications. The highest number of notifications was generated by the 23 serotypes pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. The overall reporting rate was 0.42%. The hexavalent vaccine had the highest reporting rate (2.81%).49.1% of the ADR were systemic. CONCLUSIONS: The overall reporting rate was low but higher than that of other authors. Proper reporting of possible adverse post-vaccine reactions is essential to contribute to vaccine safety and to increase public confidence in vaccines

Broncoespasmo y flushing tras la vacunación con neumococo polisacárida de 23 serotipos en pacientes crónicos / Bronchospasm and flushing after vaccination with 23 serotype pneumococcal polysaccharide in chronic patients

Objetivos: Describir las características clínico-epidemiológicas en una serie de casos de sospecha de reacciones adversas sistémicas registradas tras la administración de la vacuna frente a neumococo polisacárida de 23 serotipos (PNEUMOVAX23(R)). Calcular la incidencia acumulada de dicha reacción y conocer si se han descrito casos similares y/o compatibles en la literatura científica o en Farmacovigilancia. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo realizado entre 01/12/2015 y 30/09/2017 en la Unidad de Vacunas de un hospital autonómico de referencia. Se calculó la incidencia acumulada de la reacción adversa sistémica para esa vacuna. Se consultó la base de datos del Sistema Español de Farmacovigilancia (FEDRA). Resultados: Se registraron 9 sospechas de reacciones adversas sistémicas inmediatas (flushing + broncoespasmo + SatO2<95%). La incidencia acumulada fue 1,036%. El desenlace fue recuperado/resuelto para todos. No se encontraron casos similares y/o compatibles. Conclusiones: Las reacciones descritas no constan en la ficha técnica de PNEUMOVAX23(R). Epidemiológicamente no se puede establecer ninguna relación causal entre la aparición de los síntomas y las variables estudiadas. Esta información podría ser la base de investigaciones más amplias que supusieran la posible modificación de la ficha técnica

Objectives: To describe the clinical-epidemiological characteristics of a series of suspected systemic adverse reactions registered with the 23 serotype pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PNEUMOVAX23(R)). Calculate the cumulative incidence of the reaction and know if similar and/or compatible cases have been described in the scientific literature or in pharmacovigilance. Methods: Observational and retrospective study realized between 01/12/2015 and 30/09/2017 in the Vaccines Unit of an autonomic reference hospital. We calculated the cumulative incidence of the adverse reaction for that vaccine. The common pharmacovigilance database (FEDRA) was consulted. Results: Nine systemic adverse reactions were recorded (flushing + bronchospasm + SatO2<95%). The cumulative incidence was 1.036%. The outcome was recovered/resolved for everyone. No similar and/or compatible cases were found. Conclusions: The reactions described do not appear in the PNEUMOVAX23(R) data sheet. Epidemiologically, no causal relationship can be established between the symptoms and the variables studied. This study could be the basis for more detailed research that could modify the vaccine data sheet

Neumonía en un paciente con trasplante renal tratado con alirocumab y everolimus / Pneumonia in a patient with kidney transplant treated with alirocumab and everolimus

No disponible